A NEAR investment thesis, rebuilt from the chain
NEAR's supply is now set by a vote. Here is who casts it.
On 2 November 2026 House of Stake voted to cut new NEAR from 2.5% to 1.6% a year. 36 accounts voted. This page reads every House of Stake vote from the chain: who holds the voting power, whose NEAR it is, and whether a vote turns into a rule.
hold half of all House of Stake voting power at block 224,000,000. 3 of them could meet the quorum on their own.
The thesis in brief
Claim. For the next five years NEAR's supply will be set by House of Stake votes that a handful of accounts decide, and carried out by validators who do not vote. So far that has worked for holders: supply growth was halved in 2025, a cut to 1.6% has passed, and a vote has already become a protocol rule. But the decision rests on about fourteen accounts, most voting with power lent from two sources, and on 43 validators. Treat House of Stake as NEAR's central bank: decisive, holder-friendly so far, and held by very few.
What it means for a holder. If validators adopt the ramp, about 67.5M NEAR are never created over six years, a supply 4.4% smaller. Stakers' gross reward falls from 5.06% to 3.24% a year. The same few accounts could vote the other way, so watch the roll call, not only the price. 9 tests say what would prove this wrong.
Do you have a say?
Type any NEAR account. Your browser reads it from House of Stake's own contracts: how much voting power it holds now, who it lends that power to, and how the account or its delegate voted on each of the 11 votes. It also reads what the account stakes, since the ramp cuts what stakers are paid. Nothing is sent to us, and no wallet is needed.
The query
POST https://free.rpc.fastnear.com query call_function venear.dao.get_account_info {"account_id": account} voting power, delegations
POST https://free.rpc.fastnear.com query call_function venear.dao.ft_total_supply {} all voting power
POST https://free.rpc.fastnear.com query call_function vote.dao.get_vote {"account_id": account, "proposal_id": 29}
GET https://api.fastnear.com/v1/account/{account}/staking pools, then {pool}.get_account
Voting power is computed in the browser with the contract's own integer arithmetic: the locked NEAR, plus a bonus that grows about 50% a year on it, less what is lent out, plus what others lend in. The record of past votes comes from data/raw/votes.json, read at block 224,000,000.
The roll call: every vote so far
House of Stake has held 11 votes since 20 October 2025, plus one test vote. Each was recounted here from the ballots and each voter's power at the vote's snapshot block. All 11 recounts match the totals the contract recorded, to the last yoctoNEAR. All 11 passed.
Whose power was cast, vote by vote
On the ramp, 48% of the power cast came from delegates lent power by Source A and 42% from Source B. The three largest holders, who vote with their own NEAR, cast 0%: none of them voted.
The query
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com
query call_function vote.dao.get_proposal {"proposal_id": N} the snapshot block and the recorded totals
query call_function venear.dao.get_accounts {"from_index": 0, "limit": 600} at the snapshot block: every account's power
query call_function vote.dao.get_vote {"account_id": A, "proposal_id": N} for every account in the snapshot: 3,597 calls
Run by pipeline/fetch_governance.py. A source is the account that funded a large lock, followed one step back; see who holds it. The voting contract was upgraded 4 times; each vote is counted with the arithmetic of the version that counted it, read from its code hash at the snapshot block.
Every vote
The median vote drew 40 voters, and the power of 3 of them was enough to pass it. 117 accounts have ever voted. The most contested vote passed with 65% of the decided power; 6 passed with 99% or more.
| # | Opened | Proposal | Needs | Voters | Turnout | For | Fewest to pass | Lent | Recount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 19 Oct 2026 | Establish a 24-Month Issuance Ramp to a 1.6% Target Rate Of NEAR Token Emissions | two thirds | 36 of 496 | 62% | >99.999% | 6 | 99.6% | exact |
| 28 | 30 Aug 2026 | Establish House of Stake as Registrar for the NEAR Top-Level Account Namespace | two thirds | 34 of 485 | 73% | 100.0% | 3 | 60% | exact |
| 27 | 28 Jun 2026 | Remove the NEAR Developer Gas Rebate | half | 46 of 469 | 92% | 99.96% | 3 | 71% | exact |
| 26 | 16 Jun 2026 | Establish House of Stake Operational Budget for July 2026 – June 2027 | half | 31 of 468 | 38% | 99.999% | 6 | 66% | exact |
| 25 | 11 Mar 2026 | NEAR House of Stake Constitutional Documents (HSP 008-013) | half | 54 of 403 | 59% | 100.0% | 4 | 56% | exact |
| 24 | 5 Feb 2026 | HSP-007: Establish a Sustainable MPC Node Infrastructure Financing Program Funded via Protocol Emissions | half | 59 of 384 | 89% | 65.0% | 4 | 65% | exact |
| 17 | 1 Dec 2025 | HSP-006: House of Stake - Mission Vision Values | sensing | 47 of 285 | 60% | 81.0% | 2 | 98% | exact |
| 16 | 30 Oct 2025 | HSP-002: Validator Support Program | half | 40 of 218 | 67% | 99.9% | 3 | 64% | exact |
| 15 | 30 Oct 2025 | HSP-003: veNEAR Holder Rewards Program | half | 43 of 218 | 76% | 70.6% | 2 | 68% | exact |
| 6 | 20 Oct 2025 | HSP-003: veNEAR Holder Rewards Program | sensing | 25 of 66 | 83% | 74.2% | 1 | 99% | exact |
| 5 | 20 Oct 2025 | HSP-002: Validator Support Program | sensing | 28 of 66 | 99% | 79.5% | 1 | 99% | exact |
Turnout is power cast over all power at the snapshot; the quorum is 35%. For is For over For plus Against. Fewest to pass is how many of the largest For voters were enough on their own. Lent is the share of the power cast that others had lent to the voter. Sensing votes test opinion before a binding vote.
Voters on each vote
At most 59 accounts have voted on any proposal. 106 accounts that hold a vote have never used it, but together they hold only 0.3% of the power.
The query
voters(N) = accounts in the snapshot of proposal N whose get_vote is not null
The count matches total_votes recorded by the contract for every proposal.
The ramp, ballot by ballot
For: 3,287,729 veNEAR from 32 voters. Against: 0.0000155 veNEAR from 1. Abstain: 1,071 from 3. Turnout 62.3%, 1.78 times the quorum. It needed two thirds of the decided power.
All 36 ballots
| Account | Vote | veNEAR | Share of cast | Lent | Power from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| delegatetoyuen.near | For | 400,189 | 12.2% | 99.9% | Source B |
| tony_bc.near | For | 348,547 | 10.6% | 99.998% | Source B |
| vinibarbosa.near | For | 330,216 | 10.0% | 99.96% | Source A |
| klausbravegov.near | For | 330,193 | 10.0% | 99.96% | Source A |
| hos.chicago.near | For | 320,459 | 9.7% | >99.999% | Source B |
| india.sputnik-dao.near | For | 316,993 | 9.6% | 99.999% | Source B |
| alan777.near | For | 302,435 | 9.2% | 99.9% | Source A |
| vote.mob.near | For | 301,587 | 9.2% | 99.998% | Source A |
| charles-hos.near | For | 300,279 | 9.1% | >99.999% | Source A |
| zaki.near | For | 225,727 | 6.9% | 97% | bcc328…58f5 |
| aurora_hos.near | For | 104,732 | 3.2% | >99.999% | as.near |
| delegate.sleet.near | For | 2,038 | 0.1% | 99.6% | its own or small locks |
| vadim.near | For | 1,817 | 0.1% | 1% | its own or small locks |
| hmtri1011.near | For | 1,696 | 0.1% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| axianetwork.near | Abstain | 976 | 0.03% | 99% | its own or small locks |
| 192080…d7b3 | For | 439 | 0.01% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| undermines.near | For | 151 | 0.005% | 15% | its own or small locks |
| ramgor.near | Abstain | 94 | 0.003% | 40% | its own or small locks |
| coffee-crush_gov.near | For | 85 | 0.003% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| edwinck.near | For | 45 | 0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| kinguin.near | For | 19 | 0.001% | 1% | its own or small locks |
| 23387b…c7be | For | 17 | 0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| oration02.tg | For | 16 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| q8i.near | For | 15 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| rahulgoel.near | For | 9 | <0.001% | 99% | its own or small locks |
| pgov.near | For | 7 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| haenko.near | For | 5 | <0.001% | 42% | its own or small locks |
| 0a7f22…5215 | For | 4 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| east.near | For | 3 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| marian_h1.tg | For | 2 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| guillermorusso.near | For | 2 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| gayus.near | For | 2 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| i1470625112-hot.tg | For | 0.1176964 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| bebekxbt.near | Abstain | 0.1174609 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| alexander.near | Against | 0.0000155 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
| b0562f…3fa0 | For | 0.0000151 | <0.001% | 0% | its own or small locks |
Who holds the votes
Voting power comes from locking NEAR in House of Stake. A lock earns extra power over time, and its owner can lend that power to a delegate who votes with it. 507 accounts have locked; 184 hold at least 1 veNEAR. In all 3,936,347 NEAR is locked, 0.30% of supply.
The fourteen largest holders, share of all voting power
Five accounts hold 50.7% of all voting power and fourteen hold 98.7%. The other 170 accounts with a vote share 1.3%.
The query
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com
query call_function venear.dao.get_accounts {"from_index": 0, "limit": 600} at block 224,000,000
power = locked NEAR + bonus, less what is lent out, plus what is lent in metrics.voting_power
The powers of all 507 accounts add up to the contract's own total, 5,394,374 veNEAR, to the last digit. House of Stake's own dashboard (stats.houseofstake.org) showed on 11 November 2026 the ten largest wallets with 81.1% and 5 delegates for a majority; this page gets 81.1% and 5.
Where the voting power comes from
Nine large locks funded from two sources hold 55.2% of all voting power, and lend nearly all of it to 9 delegates. Source A is one key-only account, 76c32e…c14c: it sent 820,025 NEAR to four other locks and locked some itself, all lent to vinibarbosa.near, klausbravegov.near, alan777.near, charles-hos.near and vote.mob.near. Source B is nfendowment03.near, which funded locks that lend to delegatetoyuen.near, tony_bc.near, hos.chicago.near and india.sputnik-dao.near; three of them are DAOs that share the signers nf-payments.near and nf-payments1.near.
| Lock | NEAR locked | Share of power | Lends to | Funded by | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cc96f5…c807 | 599,997 | 15.3% | keeps it | 0ac0e2…b263 sent 500,000; 32400a…81e6 sent 99,996 | |
| 4783b5…6172 | 499,028 | 12.8% | keeps it | its own money came back from a staking pool or lockup | |
| nfendowment03.sputnik-dao.near | 300,005 | 6.6% | tony_bc.near | eb3fb6…e7c2 sent 2,499,989; c1f4ca…f2a3 sent 149,999 | B |
| chicagonode.sputnik-dao.near | 300,002 | 6.3% | hos.chicago.near | nfendowment03.near sent 300,000 | B |
| c1f4ca…f2a3 | 300,000 | 6.7% | delegatetoyuen.near | opgran01.near sent 3,500,000; nfeco08.near sent 2,400,000; 0680f6…7e57 sent 1,699,990 | B |
| cn4.sputnik-dao.near | 299,999 | 6.0% | india.sputnik-dao.near | nfendowment03.near sent 300,000 | B |
| spareuni818.near | 291,520 | 8.2% | keeps it | 1faca8…21f1 sent 291,520 | |
| 0df78d…9d63 | 220,005 | 6.2% | vinibarbosa.near | 76c32e…c14c sent 220,010 | A |
| 76c32e…c14c | 219,980 | 6.2% | klausbravegov.near | 30d620…3f62 sent 1,000,000 | A |
| a268c8…3f38 | 200,099 | 5.7% | alan777.near | 76c32e…c14c sent 200,000 | A |
| 26945c…8416 | 200,002 | 5.7% | charles-hos.near | 76c32e…c14c sent 200,005 | A |
| 2c494a…9cc4 | 200,000 | 5.7% | vote.mob.near | 76c32e…c14c sent 200,010 | A |
| bcc328…58f5 | 144,946 | 4.1% | zaki.near | d73888…71b9 sent 571,943 | |
| as.near | 50,000 | 1.4% | aurora_hos.near | no transfer of 10,000 NEAR or more in its first 100 transactions |
The query
GET https://api.nearblocks.io/v1/account/{lock}/txns?order=asc&per_page=25&page=1..4 the first 100 transactions
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com query call_function {dao}.get_policy {} who signs for each DAO
A lock is large if it holds 50,000 NEAR or more. Two locks are linked if one sent the other 10,000 NEAR or more, if one account sent both that much, or if both are DAOs with a signer in common. Money that came back from a staking pool or lockup is not a funder. The funding trace uses NearBlocks, an indexer, checked on 2026-11-11; the locks and loans themselves are read from the chain. The names nfendowment03 and nf-payments suggest NEAR Foundation, but no public source found says who controls these accounts, and this page does not claim it.
Linked money is not one vote
On 7 of the 11 votes where two or more of Source A's delegates voted, they did not all vote the same way. On the two votes about NEAR's supply and fees, the gas rebate and the ramp, every one of them voted For. The three largest holders vote with their own NEAR: cc96f5…c807 and 4783b5…6172 voted For removing the gas rebate in July, then stayed away from the ramp.
| # | Account | veNEAR | Share | Lent | Power from | Voted | On the ramp | near.social |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cc96f5…c807 | 827,867 | 15.3% | 0.003% | its own lock | 5 of 6 | did not vote | |
| 2 | 4783b5…6172 | 690,536 | 12.8% | 0% | its own lock | 4 of 6 | did not vote | |
| 3 | spareuni818.near | 448,820 | 8.3% | 1% | its own lock | 1 of 9 | did not vote | |
| 4 | delegatetoyuen.near | 410,335 | 7.6% | 99.9% | Source B (nfendowment03.near) | 11 of 11 | For | |
| 5 | tony_bc.near | 357,744 | 6.6% | 99.998% | Source B (nfendowment03.near) | 3 of 3 | For | |
| 6 | vinibarbosa.near | 336,970 | 6.2% | 99.96% | Source A (76c32e…c14c) | 11 of 11 | For | yes |
| 7 | klausbravegov.near | 336,939 | 6.2% | 99.96% | Source A (76c32e…c14c) | 11 of 11 | For | |
| 8 | hos.chicago.near | 329,429 | 6.1% | >99.999% | Source B (nfendowment03.near) | 1 of 2 | For | |
| 9 | india.sputnik-dao.near | 326,186 | 6.0% | 99.999% | Source B (nfendowment03.near) | 1 of 1 | For | |
| 10 | alan777.near | 308,608 | 5.7% | 99.9% | Source A (76c32e…c14c) | 10 of 11 | For | |
| 11 | vote.mob.near | 307,748 | 5.7% | 99.998% | Source A (76c32e…c14c) | 9 of 11 | For | |
| 12 | charles-hos.near | 306,408 | 5.7% | >99.999% | Source A (76c32e…c14c) | 7 of 11 | For | |
| 13 | zaki.near | 230,328 | 4.3% | 97% | bcc328…58f5 | 8 of 11 | For | |
| 14 | aurora_hos.near | 106,993 | 2.0% | >99.999% | as.near | 7 of 9 | For |
Voted counts the votes the account took part in, of those it could vote on. Key-only accounts are shown by the start and end of their 64-character name.
Who pays, and who has to act
New NEAR goes mostly to stakers: 90% of it, the rest to the protocol treasury. So the ramp is a cut in what stakers are paid. And a vote changes nothing by itself: the ramp takes effect only when validators run a release that includes it.
The voters are not the stakers
Every account that has ever voted stakes 154,969 NEAR with validators: 0.027% of the 582M NEAR staked. The 36 who voted for the ramp stake 8,213. Even if every NEAR locked in House of Stake were also staked, voters would hold 0.8% of the stake whose pay the ramp cuts.
The query
GET https://api.fastnear.com/v1/account/{voter}/staking pools the account has used
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com query call_function {pool}.get_account_staked_balance at block 224,000,000
Stake held through liquid staking tokens, or by the same person under another account, is not counted. The pool list comes from FastNEAR's index, checked on 2026-11-11.
Validators who must adopt it
A protocol change takes effect once validators with 80% of the stake run it. That takes the 43 largest of 351 validators. The 5 largest, with 21.7% of the stake, could hold it up. None of those 43 validators' owner accounts holds a House of Stake vote.
The query
POST https://rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com validators [null] epoch 4958: every validator's stake
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com query call_function {pool}.get_owner_id {}
EXPERIMENTAL_protocol_config protocol_upgrade_stake_threshold = 4/5
The five validators that could hold up an upgrade
| Pool | Stake, NEAR | Share | Owner account | Owner holds a vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| astro-stakers.poolv1.near | 33,207,965 | 5.7% | astrostakers.near | no |
| figment.poolv1.near | 28,657,490 | 4.9% | figment.near | no |
| ledgerbyfigment.poolv1.near | 23,199,679 | 4.0% | ledgerxfigment.near | no |
| staked.poolv1.near | 21,234,655 | 3.6% | staked.near | no |
| binancenode1.poolv1.near | 20,149,691 | 3.5% | binancenode1.near | no |
Does a vote become a rule?
House of Stake's contract can move tokens and call contracts, but it cannot change the protocol. Issuance and fees are protocol settings. So the test of the system is whether a vote is carried into a nearcore release and validators run it.
New NEAR created, as a yearly rate over 30 days
Supply grew 5.03% a year before the 2025 cut and 2.47% after. That cut reached the chain at block 170,351,519 on 29 October 2025, through a validator upgrade, before House of Stake's first vote. About 88,323 new NEAR are created a day now.
The query
POST https://archival-rpc.mainnet.fastnear.com block {"block_id": H} header.total_supply at 251 blocks
POST https://near-mainnet.gateway.tatum.io EXPERIMENTAL_protocol_config {"block_id": H} max_inflation_rate, burnt_gas_reward
growth = (supply now / supply 30 days earlier) ^ (365.25 / 30) - 1
As a second source, BigQuery's circulating_supply table (sql/03_supply_daily.sql) gives 2.48% a year over the last 365 days, against 2.48% from block headers.
The gas rebate: voted, shipped, in force
- 3 July 2026: House of Stake passes proposal 27, Remove the NEAR Developer Gas Rebate, 99.96% For, 46 voters (forum thread).
- 23 July 2026: the change is merged into nearcore (pull request 16108) and ships in release 2.14.0 (releases).
- 4 November 2026: from block 223,012,337, protocol version 87, contracts get 0% of the gas they burn instead of 30%. 124 days after the vote closed.
The block is found by binary search on burnt_gas_reward in the protocol settings. The rebate was worth at most 299 NEAR a day over the last 30 days of fees, 0.3% of daily issuance: a small change to supply, and a clear test that a vote can reach the protocol.
The ramp: passed, not yet a rule
- 2 November 2026: the vote closes. 32 voters For, 1 Against with 0.0000155 veNEAR, 3 abstaining.
- Until 16 November 2026, 16:48 UTC: the timelock. Any one of the five council accounts can veto it on its own (contract source). Status at block 224,000,000: Timelock.
- Then: the proposal carries no on-chain action, so nothing happens on chain when it passes. Per its text, activation comes one full quarter after ratification, once a nearcore release implements it and validators with 80% of the stake run it (forum thread).
Issuance cap on chain at block 224,000,000: 2.5%. The test "Validators carry out what House of Stake votes" is due on 1 June 2027.
What the ramp moves, and what it would have cost to stop
The ramp lowers the issuance cap from 2.5% to 1.6% in a straight line over 24 months. At today's supply that is 11.8M fewer new NEAR a year once it is done, about $42.8M at $3.62.
Total supply with and without the ramp
Over six years the ramp leaves 67.5M NEAR uncreated, a supply 4.4% smaller, worth $244.5M at today's price. Defeating it would have taken 1.64M veNEAR voting Against: one veNEAR for every 7.2 NEAR a year the ramp moves.
The query
cap(month) = 2.5% - 0.9% x min(month, 24) / 24 supply(month) = supply(month - 1) x (1 + cap(month) / 12), from 1,311,369,546 NEAR at block 224,000,000 Against needed = For / (2/3) - For - Against the ramp needed two thirds of the decided power
metrics.supply_path, metrics.issuance_avoided and metrics.power_to_block. This is arithmetic on a stated rule, not a forecast: it ignores burned fees and starts the ramp at once, where the proposal waits a quarter.
What would change my mind
Each test is computed on every rebuild from the same raw data. The limits are my own choice, set after seeing the data, and are written in pipeline/falsifiers.py. Now: 7 holding, 2 due, 0 broken.
| Claim | It breaks if | Now | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| A handful of accounts can decide | It takes 10 or more accounts to hold half of all voting power | 5 accounts hold half, at block 224,000,000 | Holding |
| Most of what is cast is lent power | Less than 50% of the power cast on the median vote was lent to the voter | 67.9% on the median of 11 votes | Holding |
| One source stands behind a large block of votes | The largest group of linked locks holds less than 20% of all voting power | 29.5% in 5 linked locks | Holding |
| Votes are decided by a few dozen accounts | The median vote has 100 or more voters | 40 voters on the median vote; 59 at most | Holding |
| The voters are not the stakers who are paid by issuance | Every account that has voted, together, stakes 10% or more of all staked NEAR | 0.03% of 582M staked NEAR | Holding |
| Very little NEAR is locked to vote | NEAR locked for voting power reaches 1% of supply | 0.30% of supply (3.94M NEAR) | Holding |
| Defeating a supply vote costs little next to what it moves | The Against power that would have defeated the ramp is 1% of supply or more | 1.64M veNEAR, 0.13% of supply | Holding |
| The vote for the ramp stands | Proposal 29 is vetoed or rejected before its timelock ends on 2026-11-16 16:48 UTC | Status "Timelock" at block 224,000,000 | Due 2026-11-16 |
| Validators carry out what House of Stake votes | The issuance cap read from the chain is still 2.5% on 2027-06-01, or is raised | Cap is 2.5%. The rebate vote became a rule 124 days after it closed; the ramp has no on-chain action and needs a protocol release | Due 2027-06-01 |
Read live from NEAR in your browser: proposal status loading; issuance cap loading.
Town hall, on near.social
A few dozen accounts decide; hundreds of thousands of accounts hold and stake the NEAR that is decided on. near.social puts both on the same footing: every author is a NEAR account, so each post tagged #houseofstake below is shown with the author's voting power and their vote on the ramp, read live. Ask a delegate how they will vote; tell them how you want your NEAR used. As of 11 November 2026, 14 of the 299 accounts that hold a vote or have been lent one have a near.social profile, on a network of 151 accounts. Among the 14 largest holders, only vinibarbosa.near has one.
Posts tagged #houseofstake
The query
GET https://api2.near.social/v1/hashtags/houseofstake?limit=20 posts
POST https://free.rpc.fastnear.com query call_function venear.dao.get_account_info {"account_id": author}
POST https://free.rpc.fastnear.com query call_function vote.dao.get_vote {"account_id": author, "proposal_id": 29}
The same from a terminal: python -m social.read. To post the roll-call report from your own account: python -m social.post --report (a dry run unless you add --send).
Re-run it
Every number on this page is filled in by code from the raw data in the repository. A missing number stops the build.
python rebuild.py # recompute everything from data/raw, run the tests, check the headline numbers a second way python rebuild.py --fresh # download the raw data again first: no keys, about forty minutes
Needs Python 3.10 or newer and nothing else. Data to block 224,000,000, 2026-11-11 01:50 UTC. Dataset hash dadf23a3595adebed5b58540dbd8648039437647e8c460bccc529ac781af06d2.
| Source | Used for | Key needed |
|---|---|---|
| NEAR archival RPC (FastNEAR, Tatum) | House of Stake proposals, every account's voting power at each snapshot, every vote, contract code hashes, supply, protocol settings, at fixed blocks | No |
| NEAR RPC (FastNEAR, dRPC, Shitzu) | Validators, pool owners and staked balances at the last block; the live readings on this page | No |
| NEAR BigQuery public dataset | Daily active accounts and transactions; contract calls and every caller of vote.dao during the ramp vote, as a check on the roll call; daily supply | A Google account, to run it again |
| NearBlocks, FastNEAR index | The first transactions of each large lock; daily price; the pools each voter has used | No |
| near.social | Profiles of voting accounts; posts tagged #houseofstake | No, to read |
For context, from BigQuery: 69,526 accounts signed a transaction on an average day from 2026-09-01 to 2026-11-10, and 756,226 transactions were made a day. During the ramp vote, from 2026-10-19 to 2026-11-02, vote.dao received 41 calls from 39 accounts: 2.1 of every million contract calls on NEAR. All 36 ramp voters are among those callers.